Trustee pay at the Kamehameha Schools, always a controversial issue, was in the headlines again this weekend.
A report by San Francisco-based Mercer LLC, an executive compensation expert hired by an independent probate court-appointed trustee compensation committee, recommended raising trustee pay by 65 percent or more, citing the complexities faced by a board that sets policy for a $9.1 billion trust. (See)
Mercer found that Kamehameha Schools board spends more than twice as much time on trust matters — 2 1/2 to 3 days a week — than do the boards of comparable nonprofit organization and for-profit corporations.
In a “CEO team Message” on Kamehameha Schools’ website, the trust expanded on that theme:
“The Committee and Mercer, LLC also observed, among other things, that the issues regularly confronted by the Trustees, from expansion of the Schools under the new Education Strategic Plan, to improving the quality and diversification of the endowment, land use and environmental issues, and litigation concerning admissions policies are highly significant, complex and time consuming matters that require a substantial commitment of time above and beyond that which is required of a typical corporate board.”
The trustee compensation committee’s recommendations aren’t a done deal: They require probate court approval and board members can always turn down any raise that gets approved as they did several years ago.
But Mercer’s findings and the trust’s follow-up comment raises a key questions about the estate’s governance policy.
Under the CEO-based management system should those duties be delegated to Kamehameha Schools’ executives and administrators or should those duties be relegated to the board?
There’s no doubt the board needs to set policy on major issues such as the admission policy litigation and the trust’s education strategic plan.
But are things like the “diversification of the endowment, land use and environmental issues” typically the responsibility of a CEO and their staff?
(By the way, Kamehameha Schools’ own tax filing with the Internal Revenue Service state that board members spend 10 hours a week on trust matters.)
There’s no doubt that Kamehameha Schools’ trustees — Diane Plotts, Douglas Ing, Nainoa Thompson, Robert Kihune and Corbett Kalama — are remarkable people, who have displayed much compassion for plight of native Hawaiians and much courage in wake of the many challenges faces by the trust.
Under their stewardship, the estate’s finances have grown at a record pace and schools are reaching more Hawaiian children than ever.
But what about future board members five, 10, or even 20 years from now? If those future board members are still spending 2 1/2 to 3 days a week on trust matters, will that open future boards to criticisms of “micromanagment?”